An increasing number of problems in the management of government contracts are now referred to lawyers, accountants, and judges for resolution. This accelerating trend has tended to deemphasize the responsibility of the agency contracting officers, who (in most agencies) have traditionally played a key role in the procurement process, including...
Procurement (Recommendations)
Tag cloud
Hide tags
Acquisition
Adjudication
Adjudicatory Decisions
Administrative Dispute Resolution Act
Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Administrative Review
Adverse Publicity
Advisory Committees
Affirmative Action
Agency Organization
Agriculture Credit Act
Aliens
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Antidumping
Appeals
Arbitration
Assistance Programs
Asylum
Attorney Fees
Attorneys
Audits
Bank Holding Company Act
Bank Regulation
Benefits
Bid Protests
Biotechnology
Boards of Contract Appeals
Broadcasting
Bumpers Amendment
Cancer
Carcinogens
Case Management
Cease and Desist Orders
CERCLA
Chevron
Choice of Forum
Citizen Satisfaction
Civil Forfeiture Procedure
Civil Money Penalties
Clean Air Act (CAA)
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
Collaboration
Common Rule for Debarment and Suspension
Compensation
Complaint Procedures
Compliance Standards
Computers
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
Confidential Information
Confidentiality
Conflict of Interest
Congress
Congressional Information Disputes
Consumers
Contract Disputes
Contracting Officers
Coordinating Committee on Multilateral Exports Control
Cost Benefit Analysis
Countervailing Duty
Customs Court
Customs Service
Debarment and Suspension
Debt Collection
Delegation
Direct Final Rulemaking
Disability
Disclosure
Discount Rate
Discovery
Discretion
Dispute Resolution
Disputes
Disqualification
Divestiture
E-Rulemaking
Electronic Records Management
Energy
Enforcement
Entitlements
Environment
Environmental Law
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA)
Equal Employment Opportunity
Ethics
Ex Parte Communications
Executive Branch Appointees
Executive Oversight
Executive Review
Export Administration Act
Export Controls
Fair Housing Act
Farm Credit Program
Farm Debt
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act
Federal Digital System (FDsys)
Federal Employees
Federal Facilities
Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Federal Rules of Evidence
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act)
Federalism
Fee Awards
Financial Disclosure
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Exports to U.S.
Formal Adjudication
Formal Rulemaking
Formula Grant Programs
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
Generic Proceedings
Government Contractor Employees
Government Contracts
Government in the Sunshine Act
Government Sponsored Enterprises
Grant Disputes
Grant Programs
Grievances
Harmonization of Standards
Hazardous Waste
Health and Safety Regulation
Health Care
Hearing Officers
Hearings
Hybrid Rulemaking
Immigration
Incorporation by Reference
Indemnification
Indexing
Indians
Information Collections
Injunctions
Interagency Coordination
Interim Final Rulemaking
Interlocutory Appeals
Intermediate Appellate Boards
Internal Revenue Code
International Regulatory Cooperation
International Trade
Interpretive Rules
Intervenors
Judicial Forum
Judicial Review
Jurisdiction
Jurisdictional Amount
Labor
Legal Education
Legislative Rulemaking
Legislative Veto
Liability
Licensing
Magnuson-Moss
Material Safety Data Sheets
Mediation
Medicaid
Medicare
Midnight Rules
Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers
Military
Mining
Monetary Claims
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Negotiated Rulemaking
Neutrals
News
No-Action Letters
Noise Control Act
Non-lawyer Representation
Ombudsman
Paperwork Reduction Act
Parole
Parties Defendant
Peer Review
People’s Counsel
Performance Management
Pesticides
Petitions for Rulemaking
Petroleum Pricing
Policy Statements
Post-Employment Restrictions
Post-Promulgation Comments on Rules
Preemption
Presidential Appointees
Presidential Oversight of Rulemaking
Presidential Review
Presidential Transition Act
Prisoners
Private Enforcement
Privilege
Procedural and Practice Rule Exemption
Procurement
Product Recalls
Product Safety
Prompt Corrective Action
Protective Orders
Public Health Service Act
Public Information
Public Lands
Public Participation
Publication
Publicity
Quality Assurance
Ratemaking
Recalls
Receivership
Recommendations
Records Management
Recusal
Regulation
Regulatory Analysis
Regulatory Negotiation
Remedial Orders
Renegotiation Act
Representation
Representative Payees
Retirement
Review of Discretionary Decisions
Review of Existing Regulations
Right to Know Act
Risk Assessment
Risk Communication
Rulemaking
Savings and Loan
Science
Selective Service System
Self Regulatory Organizations
Separation of Functions
Settlements
Simplified Proceedings
Social Security
Solid Waste Disposal Act
Sovereign Immunity
Special Government Employee
Specialized Courts
Statistics
Statutory Interpretation
Statutory Time Limits
Subpoena (Subpena)
Summary Decision
Sunshine Act
Superfund
Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
Suspension
Taxation
Technical Standards
Technology
Teleconferences
Thrifts
Time Limits
Training
Transportation
Trial-type Procedures
United States as Defendant
User Fees
Vaccine Injury Compensation
Valuation of Human Life
Venue
Veterans
Video Hearings
Visas
Voluntary Consensus Standards
Whistleblowers
Worker Health and Safety
- Recommendation number: 89-2
- Adopted on: June 15, 1989
- Tags: Acquisition, Contracting Officers, Dispute Resolution, Disputes, Federal Acquisition Regulation, Government Contracts, Mediation, Procurement
- Recommendation number: 88-2
- Adopted on: June 9, 1988
- Tags: Government Contracts, Indemnification, Liability, Procurement
Indemnification of government contractors for third-party liability involves this issue: Who should bear the risk of liability for injury or damage to a third party caused by products and services supplied by government contractors? This issue is especially significant when the products and services involve high-risk or hazardous governmental...
- Recommendation number: 83-1
- Adopted on: June 10, 1983
- Tags: Congress, Government Contracts, Procurement
The Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. 601-613, enacted in 1978, established a comprehensive system for resolving disputes arising out of federal government contracts. Under the Act, disputes...
- Recommendation number: 87-11
- Adopted on: December 18, 1987
- Tags: Congress, Contract Disputes, Dispute Resolution, Government Contracts, Mediation, Procurement
...
- Recommendation number: 95-5
- Adopted on: January 15, 1995
- Committees: Administration and Management
- Government Contracts, Procurement
In contrast to the private contracting system, which relies mainly on profit maximization and reputation to constrain the discretion of private purchasers in dealing with potential sellers, United States law provides a variety of opportunities for disappointed seekers of government contracts to air their grievances against the contracting process...
- Recommendation number: 75-2
- Adopted on: June 6, 1975
- Tags: Affirmative Action, Government Contracts, Procurement
Executive Order 11246, which concerns equal employment opportunity, applies to all contractors with the Federal Government. Pursuant to this executive order, the Department of Labor has promulgated one set of regulations prohibiting discrimination and requiring affirmative action to govern contractors in the construction industry, and another set of such regulations to...
- Recommendation number: 70-5
- Adopted on: June 3, 1970
- Tags: Government Contracts, Procurement, Renegotiation Act
1. Criteria for Determining Excessive Profits
The Renegotiation Board should publish in an appropriate form specific information describing the manner in which it applies each of the statutory factors. In the case of statutory factors for which the Board applies quantitative norms, a guide or statement specifically describing those...