The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act requires the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to hold a formal evidentiary hearing in connection with promulgation of certain types of rules of general applicability. Detailed findings of fact based solely on the record must accompany the regulations, and such findings are subject to judicial review on a substantial evidence test....
Rulemaking (Recommendations)
Tag cloud
Hide tags
- Recommendation number: 71-7
- Adopted on: December 7, 1971
- Tags: Ex Parte Communications, Formal Rulemaking, Hearings, Public Participation, Rulemaking
- Recommendation number: 71-6
- Adopted on: December 7, 1971
- Tags: Adjudication, Hearings, Intervenors, Public Participation, Rulemaking, Trial-type Procedures
Individuals and citizen organizations, often representing those without a direct economic or personal stake in the outcome, are increasingly seeking to participate in administrative hearings. Their concern is to protect interests and present views not otherwise adequately represented in the proceedings. Agencies are exposed to the views of their staffs, whose positions...
- Recommendation number: 71-3
- Adopted on: May 8, 1971
- Tags: Policy Statements, Rulemaking
Agencies of the Federal Government should strive to act on the basis of articulated policies and standards. Concerns of good government and efficient management support this general principle, as do the developing views of the Federal courts.
Recommendation
Agency policies which affect the public should be...
- Recommendation number: 69-8
- Adopted on: October 22, 1969
- Tags: Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Congress, Public Participation, Rulemaking
Recommendation
In order to assure that Federal agencies will have the benefit of the information and opinion that can be supplied by persons whom regulations will affect, the Administrative Procedure Act requires that the public must have opportunity to participate in rulemaking proceedings. The procedures to assure this opportunity...
- Recommendation number: 69-6
- Adopted on: October 22, 1969
- Tags: Adjudication, Rulemaking, Statistics
Government agencies which conduct formal or informal rulemaking proceedings or cases of adjudication which directly fix the rights and obligations of private persons (hereafter referred to as “proceedings”)[1] owe a special duty to the individuals affected and to the general public to manage their caseloads as efficiently as possible, to eliminate inordinate...
- Recommendation number: 68-5
- Adopted on: December 11, 1968
- Tags: Advisory Committees, Congress, People’s Counsel, Representation, Rulemaking
A. Agency Efforts
1. Federal agencies should engage more extensively in affirmative, self-initiated efforts to ascertain directly from the poor their views with respect to rulemaking that may affect them substantially. For this purpose, agencies should make strong efforts, by use of existing as well as newly devised procedures, to obtain...
- Recommendation number: 2012-2
- Adopted on: June 14, 2012
- Tags: Congress, Rulemaking
There has been a documented increase in the volume of regulatory activity during the last months of presidential terms.[1] This includes an increase in the number of legislative rules (normally issued under the Administrative Procedure Act’s (APA) notice and comment procedures)...
- Recommendation number: 2011-2
- Committees: Regulation
- Tags: Administrative Procedure Act (APA), E-Rulemaking, Electronic Records Management, Judicial Review, Public Participation, Records Management, Rulemaking
- Recommendation number: 2011-2
- Committees: Regulation
- Tags: Administrative Procedure Act (APA), E-Rulemaking, Electronic Records Management, Judicial Review, Public Participation, Records Management, Rulemaking
- Recommendation number: 2011-1
- Committees: Rulemaking
- Tags: Administrative Procedure Act (APA), E-Rulemaking, Electronic Records Management, Judicial Review, Records Management, Rulemaking